• Home
  • Firm Blog
  • Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Law – The Discovery Rule & The Statute of Limitations

July 4th, 2012

Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Law – The Discovery Rule & The Statute of Limitations

Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Law – The Discovery Rule & The Statute of Limitations

Last updated: November 18, 2015 | Published: July 4, 2012

The statute of limitations is one of the most important issues in any medical malpractice lawsuit in Pennsylvania. This is because many cases of medical negligence are not recognized, let alone filed, within the usual 2 year statute of limitations. In Pennsylvania medical malpractice cases, the 2 year clock starts ticking on the date the negligent act occurred.  However, patients who may suspect something is wrong often tend to give doctors the benefit of the doubt, and often believe what a doctor says about an unusual symptom or pain the patient has been experiencing.

Many patients with valid surgical malpractice cases in PA state that after a surgical procedure, they report a new or unusual symptom to their surgeon, who says nothing about it or brushes it off. Many times, the patient will see other doctors within the same practice and those doctors will say that everything looks normal. This often results in the patient learning many months, if not years later, that the original surgeon committed negligence.

Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Cases – The Discovery Rule

Pennsylvania, like most states, has adopted what is known as the “discovery rule.” It is an exception to the general 2 year statute of limitations which applies in most personal injury cases.

When applying the discovery rule, the clock begins ticking not on the date of the alleged negligent action, but the date the plaintiff learns of an injury and the cause of that injury. So, in situations where the connection between the injury and the doctor or surgeon’s conduct is not clear, the discovery rule could operate to toll or stall the statute of limitations until the patient discovers or reasonably should discover the injury and its cause.

The important issue is explaining why the injured patient could not, despite exercising reasonable diligence, know the cause of the injury. Fine v. Checcio (Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 2005). In addition, simply losing confidence in the doctor or surgeon is not enough, in and of itself, to stop the statute of limitations clock. Caro v. Glah (Pennsylvania Superior Court, 2004).

Patients who suspect medical malpractice by a doctor or surgeon in Pennsylvania should seek legal advice as soon as possible to discuss the specifics of their case. Statute of limitations issues are very fact intensive and require analysis by a medical malpractice lawyer in Pennsylvania.

For more information, contact our Pennsylvania and New Jersey medical malpractice and surgical error lawyers. Click To Call.

Our medical malpractice attorneys serve victims in the following areas: Allegheny County, PA; Berks County, PA; Bucks County, PA; Chester County, PA; Delaware County, PA; Lehigh County, PA; Montgomery County, PA; Northampton County, PA: Philadelphia County, PA; Atlantic County, NJ; Burlington County, NJ; Camden County, NJ; Cumberland County, NJ; Gloucester County, NJ; Salem County, NJ; New Castle County, DE; he County, DE; Atlantic City, NJ; Philadelphia, PA; Pittsburgh, PA; Newark, NJ; Doylestown, PA; Media, PA; West Chester, PA; Norristown, PA; Camden, NJ; Wilmington, DE; Newark, DE; Georgetown, DE; and New Castle, DE. Our lawyers can obtain special admission in other states on a case by case basis.

**This website does not provide legal advice. Every case is unique and it is crucial to get a qualified, expert legal opinion prior to making any decisions about your case. See the full disclaimer at the bottom of this page.